FSE/ESF Forum social européen/European Social Forum - Statement on the postal directive - December 2006
[FSE/ESF Forum social européen/European Social Forum]
Back to the frontpage
MALMÖ 2008 | ATHENA 2006 | LONDON 2004 | PARIS 2003 | FIRENZE 2002
FSE-ESF - Menu
Prep Process (EPA-AEP)
About ESF 2012
About Istanbul 2010
About Malmö 2008
About Athens 2006
About London 2004
About Paris 2003
About Firenze 2002

Europe on the move
European Conferences/Manifestations
Analysis/ statements for a better world

Social Forums in the World
World Social Forum
Southern Africa Social Forum (SASF)
South Asia Social Forum (SASF)
Mesopotamia Social Forum

European Social Forum Networks
Correos de los movimientos sociales
Public services
Charter // another Europe
Education

Memoria Viva
Tools and contents
Athens 2006 Reports
London 2004 Reports
Paris 2003 Reports
Other docs Paris 2003
Social Movements

FSE-ESF [ACCESS WORKSPACE]
NEW WORKSPACE
OPEN ESF HOMEPAGE

FSE-ESF [MAILING LIST]
ESF-FSE LISTS
- EUROPEAN LIST (fse-esf)
- FRENCH LIST (CIFs)
- ALL THE LISTS

FSE-ESF [SEARCH]
SEARCH IN THE SITE
ADVANCED RESEARCH
 
// European Social Forum Networks // Public services // POSTAL


Statement on the postal directive - December 2006 [en] | fr
12 October 2007

 

European Network for Public Services
Réseau Européen pour les Services Publics
Red europea por los Servicios Publicos
Rete Europea per i Servizi Pubblici
Europäisches Netzwerk für Öffentlichere Dienste

C O M M U N I C A T I O N December 2006

Composed of men and women members of associations, trade union organizations, social and political movements, institutional representatives, local authorities, the European Network for Public Services expresses its deeper concern about the new postal directive examined this end of the year by the European council. This directive recommends the end of the reserved area for the mail of less than 50g to the national Postal Services, which allows them to finance the mission of universal service. With this intention the Commission proposes unacceptable solutions for the European community:

The directive directly threatens the quality and perenniality of the employment of millions of postal workers and of dependent industries through Europe. Since the beginning of the process of liberalization, one does not count any more the suppressions of employment (more than 100 000 in a few years between Germany, France and the United Kingdom), with the introduction of flexibility, with the temporary employment, imposed part time and subcontracting founding a statute of "worker at request", even using child labor, in Germany for instance.
All that is in line with the "flexicurity" ideology preached by the Commission.

The directive does not meet the needs of the users of the European Postal service, while being directed towards a rise in the tariffs for the smaller users, the end of the uniform tariffs and the reduction of the infrastructures of access and the services, letter-boxes, number and schedules of collections, reduction of the network of post offices.

The directive puts in danger the concepts of social and territorial cohesion that the European post offices always assumed near the community. By preaching the acceleration of closings or the transformations into poor substitutes of the post offices, the commission approves a process which goes against the principles retained in preamble to the directive and the European treaties, especially in matters of economic and social cohesion for the community .

The postal public services cannot put up with a total opening of the mail market. It is a fragile sector, whose results are closely related to the economic health of the countries, it is also a sector which is not expanding with the competition of new technologies of communication.
In spite of that, the European Commission does not adopt a careful position and bases itself on truncated studies because they do not relate to the quality of employment (last study published in 2002 on figures of 2000) and even less on the satisfaction of the needs for the European users, citizens, industry and communities.

We dismiss this proposal of opening, as we oppose any intermediate measurement (opening to 20g for example), it would be a step moreover toward one liberalization that made only damage until today.

The commission would rather work at the creation of a postal public utility on a European scale, meeting the users requirements, making benefits from the best economies of scale that such a service in network could provide. Why not with a uniform tariff of the mail from Stockholm to Grenade?

Contact : athens-sp-anim@ras.eu.org







Statement on the Postal Directive -(33.7 kb)

1 Message

 
article au format texte pour impression Print this article
IN THE SAME SECTION

- Eurothermometer on postal services (en) | en
FSE/ESF Forum social européen/European Social Forum
Website built with SPIP, free-software | Hosted by the RAS, Union and Organization Network | CONTACTS | WEBMASTER | FRONT |ADMIN